A brief synoptic parallel — Taking the side of the ‘modern’ in philosophy — Old and new relations between science and philosophy — Matrices and principles. Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’. : Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy ( ) by Francois Laruelle and a great selection of similar New, Used and.
|Published (Last):||19 July 2013|
|PDF File Size:||1.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.65 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Since a decision is external, any particular philosophy is incapable of thinking its own decision; rather the decision is its blindspot.
These functors, as used by Laruelle and many others, are useful in orienting toward a new aperture, not as a tool to be folded back into the system.
While Laruelle has developed his project over a number of decades, he has always attempted to engage with new material in order to challenge and deepen the project. It is worth noting that in these chapters Laruelle’s aping of Badiou’s polemical style is fully displayed and that many of the most entertaining lines are found here. Against this, Laruelle opposes a qualitative use of ideas taken from quantum physics. Info to Any Future Materialism. Certain key parallels and differences are then expanded in the chapters that follow.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Christopher Norris – – Continuum.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? By purifying philosophy, bringing maois, back as a powerful thinking tool to think through questions in science, arts, politics and love, Badiou should be considered a liberator from such antiphilosopher as Laruelle.
It impossibilizes logic and theory without destroying them, instead simplifying them into their materiality, reducing them to the state of fiction— but a logic-fiction or philo-fiction. Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants.
Short note on Laruelle’s Anti-Badiou
Google Books no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers.
The stance of Anti-Badiou is not to negate or replace Badiou’s picture of reality with another, but only to see it as one amongst many within a democracy of thought.
Alain Badiou in Continental Philosophy categorize this paper. Sign philoophy Create an account. Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. Customers who bought this item also bought. From this very programmatic chapter he then moves to two chapters that make up the primary polemic of the book.
Added to PP index Total downloads 14of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Much of this work was motivated by an attempt to respond to the various criticisms and perceived weaknesses of the first volume.
In turn, Laruelle explains the contrast with his own non-philosophy as a true democracy of thought that breaks philosophy’s continual enthrall with mathematics and instead opens up a myriad of ‘non-standard’ places where thinking can be found and practised.
It must always draw its truths out of these truth procedures: We require further details as to the new version of non-philosophy, and as to the analytic means that will allow us to detect in Badiou the indestructible residue of philosophy, and its conservation-reeducation by Cantor and Mao anti-baciou the sign of Plato.
One can imagine that philisophy will propose a new formalisation for philosophy that takes into account Laruelle’s lhilosophy.
Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy – Francois Laruelle – Google Books
But this is no ordinary gnosis, this is the inversion of Gnosticism without god, and venture into the democracy of thought, that is at once an attack upon the academic aristocracy, and a realignment with the scientific movement of thinking and knowing at the conjuncture of the real.
The Parmenides problematic solved. Laruelle phikosophy undertakes a more careful examination of those differences in order to spell out where his own project differs and does so, in his view, for the better. From this understanding of philosophy, we can say that introductionn nonphilosophy does is philoophy the decisional authority of philosophy. Perhaps unlike the Greek playwright, Laruelle’s polemic also reveals something true about the character of Badiou’s philosophy.
In “Matrices and Principles” he develops the differences in what could be called meta-philosophy for the two thinkers. At face value, the two have much in common: English Choose a language for shopping. The result is very interesting as an elucidation of those ideas, but quite inadequate as an attempt to come to grips with Badiou’s philosophy and its flaws.
ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics.