and Gellner never settled on a definition of populism (Taggart. ), which Margaret Canovan’s Populism () comes up with a typology. Populism by Margaret Canovan, , Harcourt Brace Jovanovich edition, in English – 1st ed. Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Margaret Canovan Abstract. Populism, understood as an appeal to ‘the people’ against both the.

Author: Bazahn Gujar
Country: Botswana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 6 May 2012
Pages: 405
PDF File Size: 17.4 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.96 Mb
ISBN: 508-5-79578-534-4
Downloads: 49362
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vur

This is essential given the great historical and cultural variety of populist phenomena, those ranging from traditional predemocratic or proto-democratic societies to nondemocratic states to fully democratic—and, indeed, liberal—modern political systems.

In sum, the earliest wave of studies on populism sensitized scholars to the importance of this phenomenon and put the study of populism firmly into the agenda of comparative politics.

For, during the s and s, a new type of populism flourished in Latin America in a radically different socio-economic and political environment than that of the s xanovan s. Post-authoritarian Greece and post-communist Hungary.

In the cahovan of the peasantry, the proletariat, and the people: In our preoccupation with populism, what is actually being compared at the highest level of generality? Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science.

Comparative Political Studies, vol. In addition, and precisely because it specifies the ontology of populism while it is also explicit about its opposite poles, our minimal definition is particularly well suited for comparing positive populism-laden and negative populism-free canovvan and also providing credible explanations about populist causality.

West European Politics, vol. Its meanings and national characteristics pp. She became a professor in the Politics Department at Lancaster University not long after its inception, later moving to Keele University where she remained until her retirement in Concept misformation in comparative politics.

University Press of Kentucky.

Margaret Canovan

Second, we must perform poopulism operations with allnot only some, properties. Comparative Politics31 4— Raisons Politiques51 3— All those attributes draw from early republicanism and, while not extraneous to the democratic principle, are fundamentally inimical to contemporary political liberalism.


Extreme right parties in Western Europe. Populism as political communication style: It is explicitly concerned with modern populism, that is, the occurrences of this phenomenon in post—World War Two democracies around the world, which is qualitatively different from populisms in either pre democratic or non democratic political settings. West European Politics34 6— In search of the lowest common denominator.

Populism – Margaret Canovan – Google Books

Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Third World Quarterly24 polulism— Concepts and methods in social science; the tradition of Giovanni Sartori. Founded in by charismatic Andreas Papandreou, it has enjoyed a long and continuous political life full of electoral breakthroughs it won Personal use only; commercial use is strictly prohibited.

Comparing canovaj methods of content analysis. Early parliamentarism and late industrialization in the Balkans and Latin America. More than ever, we need a minimal definition of populism so that, ultimately, we will be able to both classify our empirical cases and theoretically compare them in meaningful ways.

Guidelines for concept analysis. Thus undefined, 1918 cannot be a valid fact-finding container—and, for the time being, we are left with no real negative pole for populism. Finally, the fourth approach questions the overall usefulness of the concept and prefer instead to work with more specific and situated categories.

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

In other words, what is the summum genusor family—the all-inclusive class of things—to which our concept refers? Chesterton Populism Hannah Arendt: And yet, despite the fact that both modernization and dependency theories of populism had fallen into disrepute, the phenomenon itself anything but disappeared.

Indeed, despite a recent infatuation with attempts to measure populism i. Interestingly enough, no significant traces of populism were found in the advanced Western democracies. Fifth, and perhaps even more crucially, our new minimal definition of modern populism points directly to its two negative poles, that is, political liberalism as has been analyzed by several authors, most notably Rawls, and autarchy or, if I were to use a rather tautological term, nondemocratic illiberalism.


A framework for analyzing its contexts, mechanics, and outcomes. Under this innocuous formulation we are compelled to treat populism as an object concept Sartori,that is, a concept used to identify distinct, albeit quite diverse, referents. Politics and ideology in Marxist Theory; capitalism—fascism—populism.

Populism ( edition) | Open Library

The classification of individual parties as “populist” is hotly disputed, as the term retains a negative connotation, refers to a somewhat vague and superficial set of commonalities between parties with very different ideological, rhetorical and organisational traits, and often cannot neatly distinguish populist from non-populist actors.

Journal of Theoretical Politics15 2— University of California Press. European Journal of Political Research46 3— That being so, and by taking our reconceptualizing effort only one little but brave step further, we eventually achieve a truly minimal definition that understands contemporary populism simply as democratic illiberalism Pappas,ab.

Political Studies62 2— Nevertheless, there is no doubt that parties with strong populist components have gradually emerged as major political players across both Western and Eastern Europe. Indeed, in the study of populism, conceptual stretching has been an ancestral sin.

Populism. By Canovan Margaret. (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1981. Pp. 351. $17.95.)

As shown in the previous sections, the hitherto failure to agree on a common understanding of contemporary populism is related to our mixing up, and studying together, different kinds of populism, which in turn has caused several methodological pitfalls. Steven Engel noted that “Canovan’s book distinguishes itself in that its aim is ‘to argue that questions of nationhood are not an optional extra for political theory, populis should actually be at the heart of the discipline’ “.

Party Politics15 129— The rise of illiberal democracy.