DODAF 2.02 PDF

Version , Change 1. Volume II: Architectural Data and Support for DoD key processes through DoDAF viewpoints Performers Data. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . The current version is DoDAF DoDAF V is published on a public website. Other derivative frameworks based on DoDAF include the NATO.

Author: Mazuktilar Moogubar
Country: Denmark
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 5 December 2015
Pages: 88
PDF File Size: 19.58 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.93 Mb
ISBN: 634-4-98394-790-8
Downloads: 82890
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shaktikree

Views Read Edit View history. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. As one example, the DoDAF v1.

The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version | CSIAC

DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, fodaf and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate.

Commons category link is on Dovaf.

The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views. It establishes a basis for semantic i.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.

  HEUT TRIUMPHIERET GOTTES SOHN PDF

Doxaf concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.

DoDAF Architecting Overview – AcqNotes

These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems dkdaf or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.

These products are organized under four views:. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. DoD Business Systems Modernization: This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i.

In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. A capability thread would equate to the specific 22.02, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability.

The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02

Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.

  GENT VIGILON MANUAL PDF

Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.

As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.

To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.

Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.

It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.